bellaterew.blogg.se

Damaged Culture James Fallows Reaction Paper
damaged culture james fallows reaction paper

















  1. DAMAGED CULTURE JAMES FALLOWS REACTION PAPER TRIAL AGE CAPITALISM
  2. DAMAGED CULTURE JAMES FALLOWS REACTION PAPER FREE FROM US
damaged culture james fallows reaction paperdamaged culture james fallows reaction paper

If the problem in the Philippines does not lie in the people themselves or, it would seem, in their choice between capitalism and socialism, what. In 1987, James Fallows, an American journalist caused a furor when he wrote about Filipinos’ damaged culture. Opinion December 29, 2018.

Damaged Culture James Fallows Reaction Paper Free From Us

I have no doubt that there are millions of Glenn Beck fans who are ready to sell all they’ve got to buy their share of some underground survival shelter who feel that they will not be needing their Social Security because once the dust settles after 2012, they’ll be busily creating an earthly paradise free from us worldly suckers. Eisenhower, 11/8/54And voile, what do we get from Rick Perry, politician from oil rich Texas?Dwight was wrong about the negligible part (I’ll get to that in a second) but he sure nailed the stupid down to the last Texas drawl. A Damaged Culture By James Fallows (the Atlantic Monthly, November 1987)– President Dwight D. Damaged And The Beast: Damaged, 1.

It’s almost like when Enron was going down and all the big wigs were cashing in and the rank and file little workers were locked out of their accounts until the stock had been plundered and toppled from a nosebleed high to the dirt beneath their feet? ( And if you really want to know how a Ponzi Scheme works, check out Josh and Chuck’s podcast How Ponzi Schemes Work at How Stuff Works.) That’s not what we have in Social Security. The Ponzi scheme is the 401K system that requires workers who participate in it to tie up their money and pay steep penalties to remove it when they might spend it better on paying off their mortgages, and then sit back and watch as the biggest demographic in American history, who were promised all the gold they could eat by their investment fund managers, retires on all that trapped money. While it’s true that you’ll never get rich on Social Security, it has worked extraordinarily well during the nearly 80 years it has been in existence. I’m completely dismissing them as people with whom I wish to have a conversation about religion because it is pointless trying to get through to them until January 2013.)Anyway, Perry is not only stupid, he’s wrong about Social Security.

But for that to happen, you’re going to have to get the tail end baby boomers back to work, contributing their revenue to the bottom line and re-establishing realistic pensions for their years of hard work. Would you like to contribute a portion of your social security benefits to another needy senior?”, and if I had the extra money, I might just do that. So, pay up Perry.I guess you could make Americans less dependent on Social Security so that someday, down the road, middle class people could check off a box on their income tax statement that says something like “Your pension and other retirement investments put your family at 200% over the average income for a 67 year old. In fact, it was running a substantial surplus, which we lend to the government, presumably so we can fund states like Alabama and Montana. Our Social Security trust fund does not add any debt to the deficit. Those funds were invested in US Treasury bonds, not some Bernie Madoff character’s initial investors, and, *we*, are creditors to the US, not the other way around.

This is what anti-tax fanatic Grover Norquist refers to Starving the Beast and making government so small it can be drowned in a bathtub. The public will be forced to turn to private institutions to take over the functions of government and then those same private companies will have us by the short hairs. As we have long suspected here on The Confluence, the Republicans’ overriding goal is to undermine government and cause people to lose faith in it. This piece might be seen as a one off curiosity, ripe for Republican scorn, if it weren’t followed by similar missives to James Fallows from other staffers that reinforce Lofgren’s confession. This post has been circulating the blogosphere for the past couple of days and if you haven’t read it yet, please do so now. Perry?To see what the Republican party really has in store for us, read Goodbye to All That, Reflections of an Operative who left the Cult by former Republican congressional staffer, Mike Lofgren.

It’s not something they do by choice. Starting a new company on your severance checks and borrowed money from your less than flush family members and then gambling it all on a venture that has an 80% failure rate is something people are forced into. Nevermind that it doesn’t work to create jobs or reduce taxes or, even more naively, stimulate the entrepreneurial spirit ( check out the 2nd hour of Virtually Speaking from last Tuesday where Jay has a conversation with a Republican)? Have any of the chipper fiscal conservatives ever tried a one man drug discovery operation in their office park headquarters? 80% of those ventures fail according to the American Chemical Society meeting at Rutgers University in May 2011.

But let’s just say this theory is like evolution. I’m going to give them the benefit of a doubt and assume they have a beneficent goal in mind because we can’t rule it out. Republicans are just spouting that entrepreneur stuff because they have to put a good spin on their policies, which until we have more data, appear to be grounded in pure, unadulterated greed and selfishness.

If they succeed, they will be richly rewarded by their wealthy benefactors whether they are re-elected or not. Between now and next November, they’ve got nothing to lose if they put the pedal to the metal and bully the Democrats into getting everything they ever wanted in their adolescent wet dreams. Since we do not know the first cause of the creation of the universe we can ignore all that facty wacty stuff.As I have intimated before, the Republicans are in their endgame now.

Read the whole thing to understand that what Karl Marx witnessed was not unique in human history. Let’s not confuse communism as being the right prescription but Marx certainly identified the illness. He was not at all afraid to veto bills in nasty ways.So, there’s nothing that stands between the Republican juggernaut and their goal.Which leads me to this article in Harvard Business Review (HT Susie Madrak) about how Karl Marx might have been right afterall. All that’s standing in their way is Brave Brave Brave Barack Obama. It turns out it was the only way to get Medicare past these obstructionist confederates who are still saving their Dixie Cups (A couple of people just laughed and instantly aged themselves). The public will not be any wiser because if it was, it would vote the Republicans back into oblivion like they did in 1964.

Damaged Culture James Fallows Reaction Paper Trial Age Capitalism

If sweating over the font in a PowerPoint deck for the mega-leveraged buyout of a line of designer diapers is the portrait of modern “work,” then call me — and I’d bet most of you — alienated: disengaged, demoralized, unmotivated, uninspired, and about as fulfilled as a stoic Zen Master forced to watch an endless loop of Cowboys and Aliens.False consciousness. According to Marx, one of the most pernicious aspects of industrial age capitalism was that the proles wouldn’t even know they were being exploited — and might even celebrate the very factors behind their exploitation, in a kind of ideological Stockholm Syndrome that concealed and misrepresented the relations of power between classes. How’s Marx doing on this score? I’d say quite well: even the most self-proclaimed humane modern workplaces, for all their creature comforts, are bastions of bone-crushing tedium and soul-sucking mediocrity, filled with dreary meetings, dismal tasks, and pointless objectives that are well, just a little bit alienating. Unfortunately, we are trapped in consensus reality as Marx might have described it, here are two particular features of the American landscape that trouble me greatly :Alienation. As workers were divorced from the output of their labor, Marx claimed, their sense of self-determination dwindled, alienating them from a sense of meaning, purpose, and fulfillment. As Americans, we should have been smart enough to avoid all of this misery.

America’s second largest employer is McDonald’s.One of the things I remember studying about the American Revolution was not that we were so adamantly opposed to paying a tax on stamps and tea but *why* we were so opposed to it. I’ll merely point out: America’s largest private employer is Walmart.

damaged culture james fallows reaction paper